India's hidden judicial challenge: When will the oldest case awaiting disposal find closure?

The Indian judicial system, despite its robustness and resilience, is often brought to its knees by the crippling issue of pendency. One case in particular stands out as a glaring example of this problem: Partition Case PS 90 of 1951, filed in the Khunti Civil Court in Jharkhand.

debates on improving the judicial system. Meanwhile, pendency has now increased to around 5 crore cases. Hence, simply reiterating the same rhetoric does not effectively address the issue at hand.

The case of Balram Kashyap v. Bhagirathi Ganju serves as a stark reminder of the need to prioritize judicial reform. It is imperative to address the systemic issues that contribute to pendency, such as inadequate infrastructure, shortage of judges, inefficient case management and outdated procedural laws. Furthermore, transparency and accountability must be improved within the judiciary, and the implementation of technology can play a pivotal role in expediting case processing.

It remains to be seen when this case will actually find closure, providing long-awaited justice to the litigants involved. As the nation watches, this case serves as a vital reminder of the pressing need for judicial reform and the importance of delivering timely justice for all.